Sunlight Through Rain
Each moment is a tiny raindrop through which the sun shines.

"In a
in the air
act as tiny

enters the
reflects off
of the side
of the drop
and exits.

In the
it is broken
into a
just like
it is in a
glass prism."


A Day In the Life ...


Lives of the Internet Gurus...


Personal Stories, Humor, and Politics

Tracy (Crazy Tracy)

Dude! Over here!


More blogs


And More


Retired or Inactive Blogs...


Visual Links

About Me -

Thursday, December 02, 2004
Here's an article from the Chapel Hill, NC Independent Weekly newspaper by way of (news and arts reporting from more than 100 alternative newsweeklies).

WUNC's semantic headache


Is the word "rights" political? Well, it is now. In trying to avoid making a political statement, WUNC radio has plunged into a politically charged semantic debate. Ever since the nonprofit organization Ipas announced its disagreement with the station over the language of its underwriting announcement last month, news of the controversy has spread nationally, drawing outrage from pro-choice groups, free speech advocates and other progressives. Last week, Ipas pulled its underwriting support from the station, a $1,680 per month contribution in exchange for five underwriting announcements per week in prime news rotation, reaching an average of 280,000 listeners. Ipas estimates it contributed $14,000 to the station in all.
December 1, 2004


Ipas is a Chapel Hill-based nonprofit that protects women's reproductive health and rights at home and abroad. That precise description of the group was broadcast in underwriting announcements on WUNC from February through September. But WUNC station manager Joan Siefert Rose says it never should have gone on the air. "It was a mistake on our part," she says. As the election approached, Ipas changed the announcement to draw listeners to policy information on its Web site; that announcement did not include "rights." When Ipas asked to restore the old language after the election, a red flag went up at the station.

The station's internal review process determined that the term "reproductive rights" could not be broadcast in Ipas' underwriting announcement, Siefert Rose says, because it constitutes "advocacy language," which goes against Federal Communications Commission guidelines. So it dropped the word "rights" from the message. "It has nothing to do with what Ipas does or whether it's a worthwhile organization," Siefert Rose says. "This is all about being a good steward of our FCC license. WUNC is a non-commercial broadcaster, and there are many restrictions on how we can acknowledge donors to the station."

"We feel the station took an unnecessary step and that they have been unduly cautious," says Ipas President and CEO Elizabeth Maguire. "We think this is a reflection of what seems to be an increasingly difficult political climate where self-censorship is occurring."

Accusations that WUNC is censoring free speech rankle Siefert Rose. "This does not affect our news department, and it does not affect our public affairs department," she says. "People who have interpreted this to mean that we are clamping down on our editorial content--that's not correct."

Was the threat of FCC action real? National Public Radio's former general counsel says no.

"It seems to me like that's a pretty neutral description of the organization's activities," says Ernest Sanchez of the original Ipas announcement. "It does not strike me as a statement of advocacy." Sanchez, whose Washington law practice represents public radio stations, says the law makes it clear that it's the station's prerogative whether to accept underwriting from any supporter. "Public radio stations are completely free to take it or leave it." FCC rules also give stations wide discretion over the language. "It has to disclose who has provided the money, but the law doesn't require anything more than the bare disclosure." Calls to action and promotional language are prohibited by the FCC.

But Sanchez says he knows of no case in which the FCC has objected to language used in an underwriting message for an advocacy organization on a public radio station. "Based on what has been said publicly," Sanchez says, "I don't understand the basis for their expressed concern that the original phrase would run afoul of the FCC rules. I appreciate and recognize their right to decide as they have, but I don't think they have articulated a very clear basis for their decision making."

Ipas' decision came after weeks of discussions in which Siefert Rose tried to offer alternative language. In eight out of 10 cases, the station and the donor will work together to "craft a message that will meet our broadcast standards," Siefert Rose says. "We did discuss ways for Ipas to discuss what they do that included 'whose mission is to provide women control over their reproductive health.' We really tried to make an effort to describe their work. We were not interested in trying to misrepresent their work."

Despite good faith effort on both sides, Maguire says, "We feel very strongly that we can't compromise our principles here. We see this not as advocating or calling for action. From our standpoint, 'reproductive rights' is half of our mission. That's what we've been doing for the last 30 years."

A statement on the group's Web site,, has garnered more than 900 signatures of support. A coalition of 22 national women's groups released a statement criticizing the station's decision. "The decision denies Ipas the ability to accurately describe their work and their mission," read the statement, which was signed by Planned Parenthood and NARAL Pro-Choice America, among others.

But Maguire says Ipas does not want others to follow suit. "We're not asking others to withdraw their support from WUNC, because it does provide a very important service to this community."

Many public radio stations no longer accept underwriting announcements from advocacy groups, says Siefert Rose; controversies like this are one reason. But the station wants to offer a venue for local advocacy groups, she says. "Raleigh-Durham is a pretty small media market, and frankly, besides the Independent and WUNC, there are not too many venues for nonprofits to get the word out."

She adds that her caution is a result of the awkward role stations have of interpreting guidelines that are far from clear. "They don't say in advance whether a particular challenge will come," she says, citing the cautious decision of ABC affiliates not to air Saving Private Ryan on Veteran's Day for fear of being cited for broadcasting violent content.

"So I think the issue here for Ipas and for others is whether the phrase 'reproductive rights' constitutes political language," Siefert Rose says. "And it's a gray area. It's not crystal clear whether it would."

"I feel like WUNC made the right decision," says Michael Brader-Araje, a member of WUNC's community advisory board and chair of its capital campaign. His family foundation has been a longtime sponsor of WUNC--and of Planned Parenthood. He says he understands the disagreements pro-choice groups have with the station's decision. But he thinks the anger is misdirected. "I think that people are upset about the fact that women's reproductive rights connotes political meaning, and they're more upset than they are about WUNC."

What does the term "reproductive rights" mean? Maguire says it's not a euphemism for abortion rights. "It refers to the rights of men and women to decide freely and responsibly the number, spacing and timing of their children" as well as "the rights of men and women to make reproductive decisions free of discrimination, coercion and violence." Ipas works in 40 different countries with differing attitudes toward birth control, abortion, sterilization and fertility treatment. So the application of "reproductive rights" can differ widely, she says.

But Brader-Araje says people who don't acknowledge the politics of the term are "kidding themselves." "The reality is, it is politically charged and that's the way it is in this climate," he says. "I don't see how we as listeners can reasonably ask (WUNC) to take a political stand." As an abortion rights supporter, Brader-Araje says he finds the dispute frustrating. "To me it all feels like a circular firing squad," he says. "This is not the right battlefield for Ipas to be fighting on. From a purely political perspective, is it any wonder that Democrats and the pro-choice movement are taking a step backward when we focus on the minutiae like this?"

Furthermore, he recommends that the station no longer accept underwriting from advocacy groups. "The station is trying its best to provide a public service to the community, but if it's going to take this kind of flack where the station is forced to justify its underwriting guidelines to the community, it's not worth it," he says. "Their job is to deliver the news, period."

Tuesday, November 23, 2004

I'm not very good at writing about personal things. Who knows why? So, I'll try to ease back into blogging by posting items of interest (to me or people I care about).

This first one is about public radio station WUNC in Chapel Hill, N.C. (of all entities!) putting restrictions on how one of their sponsors could describe their mission statement. It seems ominious to me when NPR (the most intelligent voice in radio) allows companies with questionable practicies or poor service (I'm a former customer) to be listed as sponsors on national news programs and describe themselves as wonderful companies, yet they are requiring this nonprofit to remove the word 'rights' from their sponsorship statement about who they are.

You may have seen something about this in the news. Here is their press release and one of the articles about the restriction of their freedom of speech related to the word 'rights'. It's interesting and disturbing to see how big business can say what they want, even when it is not true, while an agency that is not in line with those in power is stopped from verbally expressing their purpose.

You can support their right to freedom of speech by signing their online petition.

Tuesday, November 16, 2004
Maybe it's time to blog again.

Friday, August 22, 2003
Hey Mike

I've been to yoga twice now! (lol)

It's a start. Once every 2.5 months! :)

Last month, I bought a book of pictures of yoga positions and a yoga video tape.

No, I've not looked at either one.

But, I did go to a class two days ago. And, I'm thinking about either using the tape or going to class again.

I've been thinking about yoga for years.

It's about time I start DOING it.


****** Mike's Yoga Blog ******

Monday, June 30, 2003
Identify Your Child (Friend, Lover, Neighbor, Colleague, Family Member)'s Drug of Choice

And, from a similar page, here's another listing.

Here's a list of signs of crack cocaine use -

Signs of Crack Cocaine Use
Dilated pupils, sweating
Drastic weight loss
Chronic sinusitis
Hypersensitivity to visual and auditory stimuli
Insomnia followed by exhaustion and over-sleeping
Appetite suppression or intense hunger
Sexual dysfunction
Dramatic mood changes:

elevated self confidence
agitation, anxiety, depression, irritability
paranoid, suicidal ideation
Unable to hold a job
Arguments and fighting with friends, family
Financial and legal problems: rent arrears, cheques are "lost or stolen"
No food in house
Very "chatty" and self-centred
Highly skilled at manipulation; seduction
Denies and lies

Monday, June 23, 2003
Pressure Addiction

This is cool!

I was looking up addiction information (never found what I was looking for) and found this! It's an interesting website.

Sunday, June 22, 2003
Something to Think about

Someone I don't know added me to a mailing list. Some of the email is interesting, so I didn't cancel. The following is a direct and complete quote from one of those emails.


Dr. Lawrence Britt, a political scientist, wrote an article about fascism which appeared in Free Inquiry magazine (Spring, 2003) a journal of humanist thought.

Dr. Britt studied the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia), and Pinochet (Chile). He found the regimes all had 14 things in common, and he calls these the identifying characteristics of fascism.

The article is "Fascism Anyone?," Lawrence Britt, Free Inquiry, Spring 2003, page 20.

Britt's "14 characteristics of Fascism" are:

1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism -
Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.

2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights -
Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to look the other way or even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.

3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause -
The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe: racial , ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists, terrorists, etc.

4. Supremacy of the Military -
Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.

5. Rampant Sexism -
The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Opposition to abortion is high, as is homophobia and anti-gay legislation and national policy.

6. Controlled Mass Media -
Sometimes the media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in war time, is very common.

7. Obsession with National Security -
Fear is used as a motivational tool by the government over the masses.

8. Religion and Government are Intertwined -
Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government's policies or actions.

9. Corporate Power is Protected -
The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.

10. Labor Power is Suppressed -
Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely, or are severely suppressed.

11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts -
Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free __expression in the arts is openly attacked, and governments often refuse to fund the arts.

12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment -
Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses and even forego civil liberties in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.

13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption -
Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions and use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability. It is not uncommon in fascist regimes for national resources and even treasures to be appropriated or even outright stolen by government leaders

14. Fraudulent Elections -
Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against or even assassination of opposition candidates, use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections."




Learn to get in touch with the silence within yourself and know that everything in this life has a purpose. - Elisabeth Kubler-Ross


Either everything in life is a miracle, or nothing in life is a miracle. - Albert Einstein


It's ten percent what happens to you and ninety percent how you handle it.


We must become the change we want to see in the world. - Mahatma Gandhi



September 2002

Theology Thursday


Sand and Stone


Thanks to Anne

Shadow and Light

Another View

Men and Women

Healing and Restoration


Cute Book Review

Suzy's New View



July and August2002

E-Folk Music

Hate Crimes

Hyde Park


Special Rights

Choose Life

Revenge vs. Acknowledgement

Letting Go

This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.

Home  Archives  Contact Me